Principle of justification - Revision history

Karen Clement at 13:33, 13 September 2019

2019-09-13T13:33:19Z

Intern at 14:37, 8 March 2019

2019-03-08T14:37:46Z

Intern: Created page with "NOTOC Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a n..."

2019-03-08T14:37:31Z

Created page with "__NOTOC__ Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a n..."

New page

__NOTOC__
Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a new radiation source, or by overall reducing existing or emergency exposures, one should achieve sufficient individual or societal benefit to offset any harm including radiation detriment to humans and the environment.

''[[ICRP Glossary]] entry - 7 March 2019''

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 13 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~__NOTOC__~~
	Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a new radiation source, or by overall reducing existing or emergency exposures, one should achieve sufficient individual or societal benefit to offset any harm including radiation detriment to humans and the environment.		Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a new radiation source, or by overall reducing existing or emergency exposures, one should achieve sufficient individual or societal benefit to offset any harm including radiation detriment to humans and the environment.

−	''[[ICRP Glossary]] entry - 8 March 2019''	+	''ICRP Glossary entry - 8 March 2019''
		+
		+
		+	'''Return to [[ICRP Glossary\|Glossary]]'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 8 March 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a new radiation source, or by overall reducing existing or emergency exposures, one should achieve sufficient individual or societal benefit to offset any harm including radiation detriment to humans and the environment.		Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a new radiation source, or by overall reducing existing or emergency exposures, one should achieve sufficient individual or societal benefit to offset any harm including radiation detriment to humans and the environment.

−	''[[ICRP Glossary]] entry - 7 March 2019''	+	''[[ICRP Glossary]] entry - 8 March 2019''

Principle of justification - Revision history

Karen Clement at 13:33, 13 September 2019

Intern at 14:37, 8 March 2019

Intern: Created page with "__NOTOC__ Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a n..."

Intern: Created page with "NOTOC Decisions that alter (i.e. introduce, reduce or remove) the radiation exposure situation should, overall, do more good than harm. This means that, by introducing a n..."